Difference between revisions of "Web 2.0"

From mi-linux
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 16: Line 16:
  
  
[[Image:zen2.jpg]]
+
 
 +
[[Image:zen2.jpg|center|thumb|300px|zen2]]
  
 
Courtesy of [http://www.andybudd.com/ Andy Budd]
 
Courtesy of [http://www.andybudd.com/ Andy Budd]

Revision as of 01:56, 18 January 2008

Link to Main Page

Back to Collaborative online technologies

Recommended: RSS

What is Web 2.0?

The term "Web 2.0" was created in 2003 by Dale Dougherty of O'Reilly Media, Inc. O'Reilly Media distributes technology based information via books, online services, magazines, and conferences. One of the conferences they are involved in is the Web 2.0 Summit which will be holding its 5th annual conference this year. It is a partnership consisting of O'Reilly Media, Inc. and CMP Technology, moderated by the program chair John Batelle and the founder Tim O'Reilly.


Error creating thumbnail: File missing
zen2

Courtesy of Andy Budd


There are numerous definitions for Web 2.0, here are a couple:

  • A perceived or proposed second generation of the web. This is were the web has evolved and improved over time and now offers better and more up to date services like blogs, wiki’s, social networking sites etc. [1]


Dr. Dario de Judicibus a Managing Consultant within Knowledge Management & Social Networking at IBM Italia.

He apologies for his English, and from reading many articles including O'Reilly's 'What Is Web 2.0' he offers his own take on it:

  • A knowledge-oriented environment where human interactions generates contents that are published, managed and used through network applications in a service oriented architecture.[2]


Web 1.0/Web 2.0

The brainstorming session between O'Reilly and MediaLive International created a list of Web 2.0 features and their Web 1.0 equivalent. One example is the 'blog' which previously existed as a 'diary/column' on a website.


Excerpt from The Incremental Web by Skrenta, February 12, 2005.

Blogs may look like regular HTML pages, but the key difference is that they're organized chronologically. New posts appear at the top, so with a single browser reload you can say "Just show me what's new."

This seems like a trivial difference, but it drives an entirely different delivery, advertising and value chain. Rather than using HTML, the delivery protocol for web pages, there is a desire for a new, feed-centric protocol: RSS. To search chronologically-ordered content, a relevance-based search that destroys the chronology such as Google is inappropriate. Instead you want Feedster, PubSub or Technorati. Feed content may be better to read in a different sort of client, such as Newsgator, rather than a web browser.


Google itself is Web 1.0, however, Google News is Web 2.0 the difference being that the first is 'Reference Web, goal-directed' and the second 'Incremental Web, subject feeds.


Web 2.0 in Education


Following O'Reilly's article is a forum and there is an interesting thread on education or eduation as it is called.